Rock paper scissors full version of advertising. Full version of the game rock paper scissors

So, a little earlier, I shared my memories of “Rock, Scissors, Paper” (hereinafter referred to as KNB) and asked what variations of this entertainment specifically affected you, others.

It is impossible not to mention that the legs of this innocent children's entertainment grow from China, where the little ones are cut into Jan-Ken-Pon.
The second subtlety: almost no one, as it turned out, did not perceive the KNB as a full-fledged game (that is, like we in the countryside, when we could simply “throw off” for hours on interest) - it was just a way to break into teams, some kind of substitute for a rhyme, etc. P.

And now the problems of a philological nature.

Attention, a short list of variations of the KNB textbook.

Many limited themselves to the banal “One, two, three!” (for example, this was done in Kharkov, in Pskov, in Moscow).
Tver: "Kamine-wadane-uefa!"
Alma-Ata: "Rock-paper-scissors and a well for water".
Sakhalin: "en-den-tso!" (Oh wow.)
Surgut: "Rock-paper-scissors, one-two-three!" (and Moscow, of course, too)

Peter screwed up. I'm just quoting.
nusha1981. “And in St. Petersburg (the neighbors in the country) there was a completely different rhyme. They said: sik-sak-suk and instead of fists there were hands. turned either back side or palm. I don’t remember exactly how they dropped out :-)”

Lviv is also not a miss.
me_riala . “And we had Chun-Ga-Chi! 20 years ago in Lvov. But recently I passed by the playing boys and also heard a slightly modified version of Chu-Va-Chi!

Surprised Kyiv.
aaz_2 . “We (mostly) had a popular expression “I-Po-Pya-Ti”, and that’s what it was called: “Who is the first - will we fold in five?”.
It was used mainly when playing on liners at a break.
It seems that the one who threw out more - he was the first to "walk".

Now (according to my observations) “tsu-e-fa” is the most popular.

A chic option from Vladivostok.
traum_vision . And we had a whole verse:

Rock Paper Scissors,
Oxygen, pillow, sword.
And a fluffy cat
He dives into oxygen.
There is paper on the machine
And a sword is dormant in a plate.
An aunt sat on the threshold
He sharpens a horn with scissors.
Two old ladies on a pillow
They began to croak like frogs.
We threw the stone down
The artist fainted.

And such rubbish
Happens every day!

And only after reading all this aloud and in unison, we began to play!

Although accepted in this city and the usual version.
theriandrora. "rock Paper Scissors
one two Three
or no words at all.

Moscow: "kamano-magano-tsuefa", "kamano-margano-tsuefa. (chichiko)", "kamane-margane-tsuefa. less often chichiko”, “kamano-margano-suefa”, “rock-paper-scissors-uefa”, “kamano, margano, tsuefa (as an option, rhinoceros kamanoga)”, “kamano-magano-eyziko”.
A more exotic option: “Piggy Phil and Stepashka du-ra-ki!”
And again a quote. viscose. “and in 2000, for some reason, they threw off like this: humanoid-marganoid-two thousand (hit the last syllable)” .
yoshizuki. “We used to play with one-two-three in our younger childhood and continued to do so at school. But from the boys I often heard “tsuefa” at the end. "Kamano-magano-tsuefa" was also there, but also. Even at the end, “campha” was added, and the game turned out to be, as it were, doubled. It was done like this. “Kamano-magano-tsuefa” was pronounced and the figures were thrown out on the last syllable “fa”, and then “camfa” was immediately pronounced without interruption, and again the action with the hands went on the last syllable “fa”. So it turned out two combinations in a row almost without a break.
A. I remember that, in my opinion, there was “campha” if in the first case there was a draw. Although I may be wrong."
hyyudu (not quite Moscow, Krasnogorsk district): “I also remember the longest formula, by the end of which everyone already forgot what they were shaking their fists for: “Rock, scissors, paper, pencil, fire, water, TV, wires, drainpipe, in general, everything without exception, except bread and cookies, tsuefa!
And even at a slightly older age, sometimes I came across the saying "Who shakes, that sucks." True, it did not help - the habit is invincible.

And without specifying the territory.
dimndroll. "rock Paper Scissors,
pencil, fire, water
and a bottle of lemonade, dadada (later tsuefa)."
lisca. “The last thing we had was the mysterious word “tsu-zi-ko”.
yarkaya. “I once heard something like: “caminola, uginola, uefa!” but we didn't play like that. "
trainbow. ""Stone paper scissors one two three" was said in chorus for the first time, and then a short version of "kaaams ​​three"
ratnick_off . “In childhood, we carried the following gag:
1. "KAMA-NO-WATER-NO - SU-E-FA!
and there was
2. KAMA-NO-WATER-NO - IN-ZERKO!
timofeev. “And we also had a generally mysterious version in our yard: “KeMeNe, NeGeNe, IN-DER-KOK!”

Undoubtedly, if you rummage through the bottom of the barrel, it turns out that every yard (if not every apartment) had its own version of the KNB. And thanks to everyone who responded to the call to remember childhood - it was very interesting to me personally.

UPD. My stupid head only today understood what the lines of Ilya Chert's song "Bridge over Eternity" are about:
We die faster than we are born again
We play "Rock, paper, scissors" for three,
And everyone always falls well -
Jump into the pit of rabbit dreams of strangers.
Well, we did not play the option with a well! I learned about this for the first time from you, my dears. Thank you, enlightened - utterly.)

Rock Paper Scissors- children's rhyme and game. A counting table is used to determine someone by a random count. The counting begins to pronounce the counting rhyme, pointing at each word to the participants in the game sequentially in a clockwise direction. The one on whom the rhyme ends is considered selected (for example, he will drive).

Rock, paper, scissors is also used as a game. Players (usually 2 players) count a rhyme out loud together while shaking their fists. At the end of the counting rhyme, they simultaneously show one of the three signs with their hands: a stone (fist), scissors (two fingers extended) or paper (open palm).

The winner is determined according to the following rules:

Stone defeats scissors ("stone dulls or breaks scissors")

Scissors beat paper ("scissors cut paper")

Paper beats rock ("paper wraps rock")

If the players showed the same sign, then the result of the game is a draw.

There are many variations of this counter. For example:

Option 1

Rock Paper Scissors,

And a bottle of lemonade

And a box of chocolates

And a screwdriver - too!

Pencil, fire, water...

Option 2

Rock Paper Scissors,

Pencil, fire, water,

And a bottle of lemonade

And an iron hand!

Option 3

Rock Paper Scissors,

And a well, too

Rock, paper, scissors and telepathy

Trains were mentioned twice in my last column about finger games. And no wonder - after all, it is on the road that we need entertainment with minimal props. But the finger theater, which was mentioned last time, is for the smallest, for two-year-olds. But a four-year-old, that is, almost an adult, is interested in more serious boy games. Not only to watch and show, but to win!

When my eldest was four, we began to while away the time while traveling on the subway by playing “rock, paper, scissors”. Well, since three figures eventually get boring, we began to look for more difficult options.

However, let's start with the classics. It is believed that the game "rock, paper, scissors" (KNB) was invented in ancient China, back in the Ming Dynasty. However, the figures there must have been different, and we do not know anything about it. Our version looks like this. At the expense of "one-two-three" (or "tsu-e-fa", or "chin-gis-khan"), the players wave their hands, and at the last stroke they simultaneously throw out one of the figures on their fingers - or a "stone" (all fingers clenched into a fist), or "scissors" (index and middle forward, the rest into a fist) or "paper" (all fingers extended forward, palm flat).

In this case, each figure beats one of the others - the stone blunts the scissors, the scissors cut the paper, the paper wraps the stone. If the same figures fell out - a draw, the next round. You can play just for the account, or for example for clicks.

But as already mentioned, three figures eventually get boring. Therefore, after playing with my son for a while, I began to remember additional ones - especially since in my childhood they really appeared in some games.

Firstly, sometimes a well was added - almost like a stone, only with a "hole": the index and thumb fingers make the letter "o".

There was also a variant with a well and fire. Fire is made like paper, only the fingers are up and spread out.

Finally, there was a very crazy sentence "stone, scissors, paper, pencil, fire, water and a bottle of lemonade."

Now, years later, I understand what was the main problem with these homemade extensions of the classic KNB, and why these versions did not become mainstream. They were invented by people who proceeded precisely from the idea of ​​​​a variety of figures - but they did not think about mathematics. After all, the classical version is good in symmetry: each figure wins the same number of competitors (one figure) and loses the same number of competitors (one).

Now look what happens if we add "well". This new piece beats two others at once (stone and scissors). In addition, paper acquires double power (covers the well and wraps the stone). At the same time, stone and scissors lose: each of them beats only one piece. Therefore, it is quite easy to increase your chances of winning - you need to show the paper and the well more often.

Obviously, the symmetry of relations in this case is spoiled by the evenness of the figures. Each gets an odd number of relationships, which means that the relationships cannot be equally divided into "wins" and "losses".

Let's try to take five figures by adding fire. By the way, quite often the KNB used not just the count "one-two-three", but some saying with the name of the game. In our case, it turned out like this: "stone, scissors, paper, and a well, and fire". The saying is not bad, the figures are also understandable. But what is the balance of power now?

- The stone blunts the scissors and extinguishes the fire, but sinks in the well and wraps itself in paper (2 wins, 2 losses)
- Paper wraps stone and covers well, but burns in fire and cut with scissors (2 wins, 2 losses)
- Fire melts scissors and burns paper, but is extinguished with a well or a stone (2 wins, 2 losses)
- The well drowns the scissors and stone and extinguishes the fire, but is covered with paper (3 wins, 1 loss)
- Scissors only cut paper, lose to others (1 win, 3 losses)

Here you can see a clear distortion with scissors and with a well. But it can be easily fixed. Who said scissors have to sink in a well? Our scissors will be more abrupt: they stick into the well on the fly and cut its rope! In general, the scissors must beat the well - and in this scenario, the five-piece game becomes symmetrical again.